Twitter Hides Biden's Neo Nazi Deals
In an exclusive, the only independent U.S. watchdog in Ukraine provided a letter showing that Twitter's executives knowingly sponsor terrorism and tried to hide that Joe Biden sponsored openly Neo Nazi militias in Ukraine while his son Hunter Biden made a fortune in Ukraine doing absolutely nothing.
The group writing the letter below is @UkraineLiberty: The are not 'conservative' and they are not 'liberal.' Their mission statement was to protect Americans from Ukrainian organized crime. They are the group that forced the U.S. State Department to reveal Ukraine has a state policy allowing the drugging of foreigners in their restaurants and cafes and then robbing them.
Ukraine is notorious for not only aiding crime against foreigners, but also in exporting organized crime to the U.S. In internal documents, the F.B.I. agrees with the U.S. watchdog group @UkraineLiberty.
U.S. watchdog @UkraineLiberty is the reason the State Department finally revealed thousands of cases of drugging and robbing foreigners in Ukraine -- now those protections no longer exist because of Twitter.
The story you see below in @UkraineLiberty's letter to Twitter is simple. By using forensic software tools, @UkraineLiberty discovered that Twitter was "ghost-banning" their Tweets on subjects like Joe Biden's deals with Neo Nazi militias in Ukraine while allowing their Tweets questioning Rudy Giuliani's conduct in Ukraine.
Jack Dorsey, Twitter's CEO, apparently told @UkraineLiberty to privately reach out to his team at Twitter, but @UkraineLiberty went public with the matter knowing Twitter would ban them.
From: @UkraineLiberty (The only independent American-run Anti-Corruption group in Ukraine).
U.S. watchdog @UkraineLiberty is the reason the State Department finally revealed thousands of cases of drugging and robbing foreigners in Ukraine -- now those protections no longer exist because of Twitter.
The story you see below in @UkraineLiberty's letter to Twitter is simple. By using forensic software tools, @UkraineLiberty discovered that Twitter was "ghost-banning" their Tweets on subjects like Joe Biden's deals with Neo Nazi militias in Ukraine while allowing their Tweets questioning Rudy Giuliani's conduct in Ukraine.
Jack Dorsey, Twitter's CEO, apparently told @UkraineLiberty to privately reach out to his team at Twitter, but @UkraineLiberty went public with the matter knowing Twitter would ban them.
_________________________________________
US WATCHDOG'S LETTER EXPOSING
TWITTER'S SPONSORSHIP OF TERRORISM
From: @UkraineLiberty (The only independent American-run Anti-Corruption group in Ukraine).
To: Mr. Collingwood Smith
Cc: Twitter, Inc.
Re: Twitter's contributions to increasing crimes against humanity, international terrorism and chilling public awareness of important social issues.
__________________________
Dear Mister Collingwood Smith,
We are currently looking over your article, titled: "Twitter’s 'Del Harvey' (a/k/a Alison Shea) and Vijay Gadde Openly Back Child Rape Stalker and Anti-Semite Racist." [See, http://matthewhopkinsnews.com/
We run the only American and European anti-corruption group in Ukraine. The group is financially independent: We neither solicit funds nor accept them. A healthy portion of our work includes confronting neo Nazism, or in Ukraine's case, full-blown state-sponsored Nazism, which has permeated the ranks of Ukraine's military, law enforcement and political sectors. If you are unaware of that phenomenon, it would not be surprising, as it is a grossly under-reported problem.
You will notice that our Twitter account, @UkraineLiberty, is blacked-out; something we knew in advance would happen when we asked @TwitterSupport whether our audio Tweets would also be quietly blacklisted in the same manner our written Tweets were hidden when viewed from other users' accounts. That is, when viewed from our account, our Tweets appeared published and visible, yet were systematically hidden when viewed from other users' accounts: A nifty trick and a tremendous waste of our time and resources. Nevertheless, life goes on.
As soon as we asked Twitter about the censorship, the 'please-verify-your-phone-
To be clear, our Tweet was to Mr. Dorsey (CEO of Twitter Inc.) and to @TwitterSupport.
Oddly, Jack Dorsey stated to reach out to him directly should anything like this happen (video of that will be published along with this letter for general public consumption).
A make-believe Twitter account is of no use to us in confronting far-reaching criminality. So, this letter should not be interpreted as a request to restore our make-believe account. Rather, it is fair notice that we will commence informing the public about the responsibility of Twitter employees, Twitter's malign corporate values, and the very real danger the platform poses to the health and safety of people around the world.
It is also a fair chance for the Twitter employees copied on this letter to respond, and do the right thing.
Twitter's deliberate and systemic concealment of third-party hate group sponsorship:
The subject matter of our censored Tweet shows U.S. presidential candidate Joe Biden courting Ukraine's, well-known, undisputed and self-professed Nazi militia leader (the man giving the Hitler salute in the photo).
This facet of our anti-extremist reporting is non-partisan, and we have also robustly criticized members of President Trump's cabinet for similar behavior. (Examples available upon request; There are many.)
These extremist groups have left a trail of bodies in their wake: people's brothers, sisters, mothers, fathers, and children.
In situations such as this, where both major political parties in the United States engaged in similar misbehavior, and are averse to discussing it, Twitter's censorship tactics are extremely dangerous because they shut down an important channel of public access to this information, while wasting our resources, which we use to keep people safe. The President lawyer understands this:
There can be no polite tiptoeing around the issue: Twitter is a trash company; managed by trash people. Respectable businesses do not operate this way.
Twitter looks to hire individuals who impersonate competence, neutrality, and morality, while green-lighting sociopaths, like the very neo Nazi assassination squads that did what you see the photos below. These groups openly recruit on Twitter and openly compile and publish assassination lists. In any responsibly managed company, any disorderly or incompetent employees that allow this would immediately have been shown the door, including those that hired them, and their professional excuse makers.
After reviewing your article about Twitter threatening to sue to silence your article, [see, http://matthewhopkinsnews.com/
We have copied Twitter's employees on this email, as a formality, prior to general publication of an expanded version of this letter because if they know, or have reason to know, this is a sufficient basis for us to reach further conclusions about the company and the people that run it. It also allows us to chart the appropriate course and breadth of action.
Improperly imputing responsibility-by-association only applies to individuals that unknowingly associate with other individuals engaged in misbehavior; It does not apply to Twitter executives that join, or remain with, a profit-making enterprise that systematically enables crimes against humanity while pretending not to notice their employer's heinous behavior. We will take steps to inform Twitter's shareholders, investors, employees, and members of adversely affected communities, including crime victims' families.
But more importantly, we will cooperate with jurisdictions outside of the United States that have laws with teeth for custodial arrest of individuals enabling terrorism and crimes against humanity; and that provide opportunities for other remedial legal actions.
A corporation's employees make decisions as to policy, execution of those policies, and whether to continue to affiliate with a company that knowingly enables international criminal activity, crimes against humanity, and international terrorism. The assumption that groups like ours will look away, or accept farcical explanations for heinous behavior, suggests extreme situational naïvety on Twitter's part. While Twitter may have secured a type of safe harbor among courts in the San Francisco Bay Area, those judicial institutions do not exclusively determine the legal rights of every person in the world.
We are not a garden-variety group:
Below is the chief of Ukraine's intelligence agency, publicly remarking on our ability to investigate all of Ukraine in real-time (a large and dangerous territory without a real media). The subject matter of the investigation is crimes against humanity and the sophisticated and monied state-sponsors of those crimes. If you consider the statement carefully, you will see he remarks on our ability to penetrate the offices of the "President and gov. [of Ukraine]" – a President now under indictment.
The Ninth Chief of the Security Service of Ukraine* is an astute person; The people running Twitter are not: Twitter now faces formidable opposition.
As a result of Twitter's misbehavior with our account, several members of our group cordially splintered-off and are heading to the San Francisco Bay Area to establish an investigative nerve-center there, which undoubtedly will generate conversations with a wide array of individuals, including investors on Sand Hill Road, people in the communities Twitter's decision-makers circulate in, law enforcement, The State Bar of California, and many others.
We look for patterns of misbehavior: Those patterns exist in spades at Twitter.
Irrespective of the explanations Twitter may have to offer for its behavior, Twitter's executives choose to work for an organization that deliberately amplifies the voices of sadistic killers, for example, the Ayatollah of Iran, whose goals in using the tools Twitter provides to him are: To cultivate recruits for terrorism; Issuance of violent religious edicts (which often also include terroristic threats); And to identify and target opponents for assassination. In other words, Twitter's executive team knowingly empowers a genocidal man. Twitter directly is responsible for the increased growth of the Ayatollah's terror squads, like Hezbollah and the Sepah Pasdaran, in many countries, including the United States. It is an opinion shared by career U.S. Government employees. The notion that courts in San Francisco or Santa Clara counties exclusively will determine the significance of Twitter’s behavior is, at best, a comedic idea.
The bottom line is Twitter employees generally have no problem accepting remuneration from a company that hosts a man who collects the body parts of spirited teenagers simply for using the Internet; and we have no problem shining the light of public responsibility on them or other individuals or companies who enable them.
The U.S. State Department's Senior Public Affairs Advisor seems to notice.
There are no instances of any Iranian-American civil rights organizations finding that Twitter providing the Ayatollah with tools and resources for his campaign of terror is the byproduct of a sound decision-making process: Not one says Twitter is doing the right thing or making people safer.
These are the types of questions we will start to ask: "Who told Twitter's executive team that empowering a genocidal terrorist was okay? Uncle-Tom style Iranians that allow Twitter's founder, Jack Dorsey, to publicly humiliate them by shaving their heads on Twitter's campus in front of colleagues while they do their best to force a smile and await their next paycheck?" (A real question posed to us by one of the Iranian-American civil liberties activists situated in the Bay Area.)
It is important for Twitter's executive team and its employees to understand: They should have meaningful explanations prepared for working for a company that provides sophisticated internet tools to a terror-leader that gouges out the eyes of citizens, executes children, amputates body parts, and tortures on a daily basis. He is a fugitive from justice. Helping incite crimes against humanity, or aiding those with established patterns of doing so, are crimes. It makes no difference to us whether criminal-enablers have a 401k plan or a corporate ping pong table.
Mister Collingwood Smith, you are welcome to publish our letter after 6:00 P.M. PST on June 29, 2020, unless we receive a response from Twitter. If we receive a reply and require an opportunity to respond, we will let you know.
Please feel welcome to reach out to us as we are in the process of bringing together similarly situated individuals and exploring what might reasonably be done.
Sincerely yours,
Formerly @UkraineLiberty on Twitter
_________________________________________
END LETTER
Twitter's CEO, apparently told @UkraineLiberty to privately reach out to his team at Twitter, but @UkraineLiberty went public with the matter knowing Twitter would ban them.
_________________________________________
Update
Twitter unsuspended the @UkraineLiberty account and immediately put it back into suspension when they showed that the Democrat Party has partnered with tyrants and despots. Obviously, Twitter seeks to control the narrative.
Comments
Post a Comment